Anosmia and COVID-19.

Anosmia associated or not with dysgeusia seems to be a frequent symptom in cases of infection with SARS-CoV-2 responsible for COVID-19. It can be the initial symptom of the disease or remain isolated in pauci-symptomatic patients. Waiting for scientific confirmation and in the context of the current pandemic, it seems essential to consider any patient with a new anosmia as being infected with SARS-CoV-2 until proven otherwise. These patients should therefore isolate themselves and remain alert to the occurrence of other symptoms suggestive of the infection and/or be tested. Topical and systemic corticosteroids and nose washes are contraindicated. The natural course of anosmia seems to be favorable in most cases.Copyright © 2020 Editions Medecine et Hygiene. All rights reserved.

Online survey about oral manifestations of COVID-19

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 (Coronavirus type 2 causing severe acute respiratory syndrome) presents systemic manifestations such as fever, anosmia, cough, sore throat and headache, dyspnea, tiredness, malaise, diarrhea. There are reports of developing dysgeusia, xerostomia, and vesiculobullous lesions as oral manifestations related to COVID-19. Objective(s): To identify the most prevalent oral manifestations associated with COVID-19 in a group of Paraguayans. Material(s) and Method(s): An electronic survey was used from January to March 2022. Data were presented as frequencies and percentages and analyzed using the chi2 test. Statistical analysis was performed with R software version 4.0.3. Result(s): The sample consisted of 478 people, most female from 15 to 34 years old. 65.48% stated that they had had at least one oral symptom or sign during COVID-19. The loss in the sensation of bitter tastes (34.31%), the alteration of the taste of food (32.43%), and the loss of sweetness (32.01%) were the most prevalent symptoms. In addition, it was found that among the people who developed moderate to severe COVID-19, there was a more significant number (77.78%) of oral manifestations compared to the participants who developed it mildly (63.92%) (chi2;p= 0.044). Conclusion(s): More than half of the respondents presented oral manifestations, more frequent in those who developed moderate to severe COVID-19. Results will serve as a basis for future research and thus strengthen the surveillance of this disease.

ENT Manifestation of Covid-19: An Experience at a Tertiary Care Medical Teaching Institute of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

Aim: To determine the frequency of ear, nose and throat related disorders of covid disease in PCR proven positive Covid-19 patients. Method(s): This prospective study included 320 Covid-19 positive patients and was conducted at ENT Department of MTI Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar from May 1, 2021 to April 30, 2022. The acute phase of covid-19 was taken as the time interval between the onsets of symptoms as day 1 today 30th post infection. Questions were asked about the following symptoms;flu, sore throat, sinus involvement, taste disturbances, smell disturbances, hoarseness and hearing loss. Clinical examination and relevant investigations were carried out to make a diagnosis. The data was documented on a proforma & analyzed using SPSS 26.0 for windows to determine the frequencies of signs & symptoms related to ENT. Result(s): A total of 320 patients were included in the study. The ages ranged from 18-50 years with mean age of 33.96 years. The age group 18-25 years mostly presented with symptoms related to ENT. Upper respiratory tract infection was the commonest symptom (60.6%) followed by sore throat (57.5%). Smell and taste disturbances accounted for in 46.3% & 15.3 % of the patients respectively. Fungal rhinosinusitis was observed in 6.9% of the patients. As there is a wide variation of the ENT symptoms in covid disease, it is important to know the predictive symptoms so that appropriate measures can be adopted. Identification & isolation of patients will prevent spread of disease and focused therapy and investigations. Practical implication Conclusion(s): The portal of entry for the SARS-CoV-2 is through the upper airway. It is important to know the symptoms related to ENT to make an early diagnosis and therefore, institute measures for management and prevention of further spread of the disease.Copyright © 2023 Lahore Medical And Dental College. All rights reserved.

Comparative Study of Chemosensory Dysfunction in COVID-19 in 2 Geographically Distinct Regions.

OBJECTIVE: To directly compare the prevalence of chemosensory dysfunction (smell and taste) in geographically distinct regions with the same questionnaires. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed to evaluate the self-reported symptoms among adults (older than 18 years) who underwent COVID-19 testing at an ambulatory assessment center in Canada and at a hospital in Israel between March 16, 2020, and August 19, 2020. The primary outcome was the prevalence of self-reported chemosensory dysfunction (anosmia/hypomsia and dysgeusia/ageusia). Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the prevalence of chemosensory deficits among the outpatients. RESULTS: We identified a total of 350 COVID-19-positive patients (138 Canadians and 212 Israelis). The overall prevalence of chemosensory dysfunction was 47.1%. There was a higher proportion of chemosensory deficits among Canadians compared to Israelis (66.7% vs 34.4%, P < .01). A subgroup analysis for outpatients (never hospitalized) still identified a higher prevalence of chemosensory dysfunction among Canadians compared to Israelis (68.2% vs 36.1%, P < 0.01). A majority of patients recovered their sense of smell after 4 weeks of symptom onset. CONCLUSION: Although the prevalence of chemosensory deficit in COVID-19 was found to be similar to previously published reports, the prevalence can vary significantly across different geographical regions. Therefore, it is important to obtain regionally specific data so that the symptom of anosmia/dysgeusia can be used as a guide for screening for the clinical diagnosis of COVID-19.

The sense of taste: Development, regeneration, and dysfunction.

Gustation or the sense of taste is a primary sense, which functions as a gatekeeper for substances that enter the body. Animals, including humans, ingest foods that contain appetitive taste stimuli, including those that have sweet, moderately salty and umami (glutamate) components, and tend to avoid bitter-tasting items, as many bitter compounds are toxic. Taste is mediated by clusters of heterogeneous taste receptors cells (TRCs) organized as taste buds on the tongue, and these convey taste information from the oral cavity to higher order brain centers via the gustatory sensory neurons of the seventh and ninth cranial ganglia. One remarkable aspect of taste is that taste perception is mostly uninterrupted throughout life yet TRCs within buds are constantly renewed; every 1-2 months all taste cells have been steadily replaced. In the past decades we have learned a substantial amount about the cellular and molecular regulation of taste bud cell renewal, and how taste buds are initially established during embryogenesis. Here I review more recent findings pertaining to taste development and regeneration, as well as discuss potential mechanisms underlying taste dysfunction that often occurs with disease or its treatment. This article is categorized under: Infectious Diseases > Stem Cells and Development Cancer > Stem Cells and Development Neurological Diseases > Stem Cells and Development.

Recovery from olfactory and gustatory dysfunction following COVID-19 acquired during Omicron BA.1 wave in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Despite alterations in the sense of smell and taste have dominated the symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the prevalence and the severity of self-reporting COVID-19 associated olfactory and gustatory dysfunction has dropped significantly with the advent of the Omicron BA.1 subvariant. However, data on the evolution of Omicron-related chemosensory impairment are still lacking. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to estimate the prevalence and the recovery rate of self-reported chemosensory dysfunction 6-month after SARS-CoV-2 infection acquired during the predominance of the Omicron BA.1 subvariant in Italy. METHODS: Prospective observational study based on the sino-nasal outcome tool 22 (SNOT-22), item "sense of smell or taste" and additional outcomes conducted in University hospitals and tertiary referral centers in Italy. RESULTS: Of 338 patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 completing the baseline survey, 294 (87.0 %) responded to the 6-month follow-up interview. Among them, 101 (34.4 %) and 4 (1.4 %) reported an altered sense of smell or taste at baseline and at 6 months, respectively. Among the 101 patients with COVID-19-associated smell or taste dysfunction during the acute phase of the disease, 97 (96.0 %) reported complete resolution at 6 months. The duration of smell or taste impairment was significantly shorter in vaccinated patients (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with that observed in subjects infected during the first wave of the pandemic, the recovery rate from chemosensory dysfunctions reported in the present series of patients infected during the predominance of the Omicron BA.1 subvariant was more favorable with a shorter duration being positively influenced by vaccination.

Neurogastroenterology & Motility Manifestations After COVID-19 Infection: A Case Series

Introduction: In a subset of Covid19-convalescent patients, a multitude of long-term sequelae are increasingly being reported. We report 4 cases with varying neuro-GI and motility manifestations after recent COVID-19 infection. Case Description/Methods: Case 1: A 23-year-old man contracted COVID-19 and had a protracted course of respiratory illness. Despite resolution of respiratory symptoms and dysgeusia, he continued to experience early satiety, postprandial nausea, vomiting and unintentional weight loss. Gastric Emptying Scan (GES) revealed gastroparesis (Figure A). Dietary modification and metoclopramide led to symptomatic improvement. Case 2: A 39-year-old woman with migraines, suffered from Covid-19 infection where anosmia and respiratory symptoms lasted for 2 weeks. Despite resolution of initial symptoms, she started experiencing nausea and vomiting, and reported stereotypical symptoms with complete absence of vomiting between episodes. Endoscopic examination, CT head and GES were normal. Urine tox screen was negative for cannabinoids. She responded favorably to amitriptyline and ondansetron. Case 3: A 47-year-old man started experiencing severe constipation associated with abdominal pain and bloating soon after being diagnosed with COVID-19. Three months after resolution of respiratory symptoms, in addition to constipation, he began reporting postprandial fullness, early satiation and epigastric pain. GES showed gastroparesis ( figure B) and a Sitzmarks Study revealed delayed colonic transit (Figure C). Prucalopride was started, leading to improvement in symptoms. Case 4: A 74-year-old woman with obesity and diabetes, was hospitalized and intubated for severe respiratory distress due to COVID-19. After discharge, she had persistent symptoms of brain fog, fatigue, dyspnea as well as diarrhea and abdominal cramping, persisting despite loperamide and dicyclomine. C. difficile toxin, random colonic biopsies and H2 breath test were unremarkable. Her symptoms eventually improved with rifaximin. Discussion(s): We report 4 cases with post-COVID gastroparesis, cyclical vomiting syndrome, pan-gut dysmotility, and post-infectious IBS phenotypes.The pathophysiology of post-infectious-gut-brain disorders is still obscure. The current conceptual framework implicates acquired neuropathy, altered motility, intestinal barrier disruption and persistent intestinal inflammation. Similar pathophysiology may be involved in COVID-19 infection leading to sustained neurogastroenterological dysfunction and gut dysmotility.

Effect of Aboand Rh Blood Type on Sars-Cov-2 Infection Severity in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases: Data from the National Sar-Covid Registry

Objectives: To evaluate the association between the ABO and Rh antigens and the clinical characteristics and evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with rheumatic diseases. Method(s): SAR-COVID is a national, longitudinal, and observational registry. Patients >=18 years of age with a diagnosis of inflammatory or degenerative rheumatic disease, and confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (RT-PCR or serology) were included. Data were collected from August 2020 to June 2022. Sociodemographic, clinical data, comorbidities, underlying rheumatic disease, disease activity, and its treatment at the time of infection were recorded, aswell as symptoms, complications and treatments received for COVID-19. The WHO ordinal scale (WHO-OS) was used, and severe COVID-19was defined as WHO-OS>=5. Patients were categorized as follows: blood group A or non-A, and Rh factor positive or negative. Result(s): A total of 1356 patients were included, 547 (40,3%) had blood group A and 809 non-A (59,7%). Regarding the Rh factor, 1230 (90,7%)were positive and 126 (9,3%) negative. Age, sex, ethnicity and comorbidities were comparable between both groups. In both cases, the most frequent rheumatic diseases were rheumatoid arthritis (38,9%;p = 0,052), systemic lupus erythematosus (17,4%;p = 0,530) and osteoarthritis (10,1%;p = 0,888). Patients with non-A blood type presented a higher frequency of psoriatic arthritis (group A 5,1% vs non-A 8,7%;p = 0,015). During SARS-CoV-2 infection, more than 90% of patients in both groups were symptomatic (group A 96.0% vs non-A 94,8%;p = 0,384). Non-A blood group patients had a significantly higher frequency of arthralgia and dysgeusia. In A blood group 18.5% of the patients required hospitalization, 41,0% of them were admitted in the intensive care unit and 5.9% presented complications, while in the non-A blood group, were 16,7%, 31,1% and 5,5%, respectively (p > 0,05 in all the cases). The most frequent complications in both groups were respiratory distress syndrome and sepsis (p > 0,05). The outcome of the COVID-19 infection is detailed in Figure 1. In the multivariate analysis, adjusted for poor prognostic factors, patients with A blood type and those with negative Rh factor presented more likely severe COVID-19. (OR 1,75, 95%CI 1,20-2,56, p = 0,003 and OR 2,63, 95%CI 1,45-4,55, p = 0,001, respectively). Conclusion(s): Blood type A and negative Rh factor were associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes in this national cohort of patients with rheumatic diseases.

The Association Between Stool Shedding of SARS-Cov-2 Microbiome Diversity and Intestinal Inflammation

Introduction: The transmission of the etiologic virus of COVID-19 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [SARS-CoV-2]) is thought to occur mainly via respiratory droplets even though limited evidence has shown the virus can be found in feces and involve the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The aim of this study was to assess if patients with COVID-19 present with fecal shedding of SARS-CoV-2, intestinal inflammation or changes in their microbiota. Method(s): This was a prospective cohort study that included outpatients that presented with symptoms of COVID-19 and were tested using a nasopharyngeal PCR test (NPT). Two cohorts were selected: one with a (1) NPT and a control group with a (-) NPT. Stool and a clinical data were collected at baseline and then, days 14, 28 and 42. SARS-CoV-2 viral loads were measured in stool using PCR and stool microbiome was analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing (V3/V4 region). Fecal calprotectin levels were also measured on each sample and used as a surrogate marker of intestinal inflammation. Result(s): 101 patients were recruited (410 total samples). Of those, 55 had a (1) COVID-19 NPT. Most patients with a (1) COVID-19 NPT PCR had a detectable fecal viral load (71%). Among these patients, 23 (55%) had detectable viral stool loads only at baseline, 12 through day 14, 6 through day 28 and 1 through day 42. One patient had a (-) NPT but detectable SARS-CoV-2 in the baseline stool sample. Subjects with (1) NPT presented more commonly with myalgias (p=0.02), dysgeusia (p=0.019) and anosmia (p=0.03) when compared to those with (-) NPT but there were no differences in any other symptoms including GI manifestations.Within the group with a (1) NPT, those patient with detectable SARS-CoV-2 in the stool were younger but no differences were seen in demographic, symptoms, or fecal calprotectin levels (Table). There was no correlation between fecal SARS-CoV-2 loads and fecal calprotectin levels (rho: 0.007 [p=0.95]). Patients with a (1) NPT PCR had higher evenness when compared to those that tested (-) for a NPT PCR. However, no differences were seen in other alpha or beta diversity (Figures 1A and 1B, respectively). Conclusion(s): Even though intestinal viral shedding of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19 is common, these patients do not present with evidence of inflammation of the GI tract, a significantly disrupted gut microbiome or a higher incidence of GI symptoms when compared to patients with respiratory symptoms and no COVID-19.

Adaptive Immunity Dysregulation Is Associated to the Development of Long Covid

Background: The pathogenetic mechanisms behind the development of long- COVID (LC) are largely unknown. Because both plasma SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia and dysregulated immunity have been correlated with COVID-19 severity, we evaluated whether they are associated with LC. Method(s): We consecutively enrolled unvaccinated hospitalized COVID-19 patients during acute-COVID-19 (T0) in March-October 2020 who either developed LC at a follow-up visit 2-3 months from virologic clearance (T1) or did not. LC was defined as persistence >=2 months after recovery of >=1 symptom: anosmia, dysgeusia, fever, gastrointestinal symptoms, dyspnoea, fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, muscle weakness, brain fog. We measured: SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia (RT-qPCR, log10(copies/mL)), magnitude (ELISA, AUC) and functionality (pseudovirus neutralization, ID50;Fc-mediated functions, %ADCC) of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies, SARS-CoV-2-specific B and CD4-T-cells (Immunophenotype, AIM and ICS assays). Result(s): We enrolled 48 COVID-19 individuals, 38/48 (79.2%) developed LC (LC+) and 10 did not (LC-). LC+ and LC- had similar co-morbidities and symptoms in the acute phase (Fig.1A), and the majority showed a radiologically documented SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. The SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia did not differ between groups at both time points. The levels of RBD-specific Abs, as well as their functionality, appeared to increase over time in the LC- group but not in the LC+ (Fig.1B-D). Similarly, a trend towards increased RBD-specific B-cells was observed over time in the LC- group but not in LC+ (Fig.1E). B-cell immunophenotyping showed a significant increase over time of classical memory B cells (MBCs) at the expenses of activated MBCs (Fig.1F-G) as well as an IgA class-switching in the LC- group compared to LC+ (Fig.1H-I). Furthermore, LC+ showed a faster decline of SARS-CoV-2-specific (CD69+CD137+) CD4- TEMRA and CD4-TEM (Fig.1L-M). Finally, IFN-gamma-producing TREG of LC- individuals increased over time (Fig.1N). Conclusion(s): Acutely ill, hospitalized COVID-19 patients developing LC feature a dysregulated SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral as well as B- and T-cell response, in both magnitude and functionality, suggesting a link between dysregulated SARS-CoV-2-specific adaptive immunity and LC development. The fine understanding of the factors contributing to such dysregulation in LC patients is strongly needed, that might further inform targeted therapeutic interventions. (Figure Presented).

Incidence of Long Covid Symptoms in Patients Previously Hospitalized for Covid-19

Background: Long COVID, also known as post-acute sequelae of COVID (PASC), affects more than 144 million people globally. While there is no broadly accepted consensus on a definition for the term "long COVID," studies have found symptoms persist or begin weeks or months after the end of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This study assessed the incidence of codes found in medical claims and hospital chargemasters that were consistent with long COVID symptoms commonly found in the literature. Method(s): Using the HealthVerity database, which provides closed claims and linked hospital chargemaster data on more than 25 million US patients, we examined patients aged 12 and above hospitalized between May 1, 2020 and September 30, 2021 with a diagnosis of COVID-19 who had at least 365 days of closed medical claims enrollment prior to index hospitalization admission and 90 days after admission, and did not have a long COVID diagnosis (ICD-10- CM U09.9) prior to the index hospitalization. Patients were allowed to have symptoms prior to hospitalization. The assessment period for the outcomes, which included 10 symptoms, was 90 days to 270 days after the date of hospitalization. Incidence rate per 100 person-years was calculated as the number of patients with the outcome divided by total person-time contributed (90 days after admission to the minimum of the following: outcome, inpatient death, disenrollment, end of data (April 30, 2022), or 270 days after admission). Result(s): The dataset included 3,661,303 patients with an inpatient hospitalization during the study period. The final study cohort included 44,922 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, 20,627 of whom experienced at least one of the long COVID symptoms. Anosmia and dysgeusia were the rarest events captured in medical claims. More commonly found symptoms were joint pain, fatigue and breathlessness (see table). Conclusion(s): This study examined diagnosed symptoms commonly found posthospitalization among COVID-19 patients and reported the incidence of these symptoms in a representative population. The start period of long COVID used in this study (90 days post hospitalization) is consistent with the WHO definition of long COVID. In the absence of an understanding of the pathophysiology of long COVID, the use of diagnosed symptoms to define long COVID has the advantage of ease of use and availability of data. Further studies of additional symptoms and predictors of long COVID are needed. (Figure Presented).

The Impact of Early Outpatient Treatments for Covid-19: A Retrospective Study

Background: Oral antivirals (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir), intravenous short treatment of remdesivir and anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been used for early COVID-19 treatments in high risk of disease progression patients. Little is known about the impact of therapies on post-acute COVID-19 (PACS). We aimed to compare the efficacy of these therapies in terms of death, hospitalization rate and PACS at 3 months. Method(s): We conducted a retrospective observational study including all eligible outpatients aged >=18 evaluated from April 2021 to March 2022 at our COVID-19 Clinic. Patients were stratified into 3 groups: mAbs, antivirals (oral and short-course remdesivir) and controls (eligible patients who refused treatment). Persistence of symptoms (fever, dysgeusia/anosmia, cough, pharyngodynia, dyspnea, chills, nasal congestion, myalgia, headache, gastrointestinal disease, and neuro-behavioural symptoms, such as asthenia, anxiety/mood disorder, memory and concentration deficit) were evaluated after 3 months. We estimated the associations between each considered outcome and treatment through univariate and multivariable logistic models adjusted by sex, age, vaccination, early COVID treatment, treatment group and number of comorbidities (when appropriate). Result(s): We included 649 patients (51.6% males, median age 67 years, 14% unvaccinated): 242 patients were treated with mAbs, 197 with antivirals and 210 received no treatment. Overall, 36.7% of subjects had cerebro-cardiovascular disease, 22% were obese and 50% had more than one comorbidity. Overall, 29 patients (4.5%) died or were hospitalized. Death or hospitalization was positively associated only with older ages with a significant linear trend (p for trend: 0.033). Data on PACS at 3 months were available for 323 (49.8%) patients. Females showed a positive association with long COVID, with an OR of 2.14 (95% CI: 1.30-3.53) as compared to men. Patients treated with antiviral drugs showed an inverse association with long COVID (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.21-0.87 as compared to not treated patients). Patients who were treated with monoclonal antibodies showed an OR of 0.48 (95% CI: 0.25-0.92) as compared to those in the control group (Table 1). Conclusion(s): The impact of early COVID-19 therapies on PACS is unknown. Our results showed that these treatments, in particular mAbs, can reduce persistence of neuro-behavioural symptoms at 3 months. (Table Presented).

Short Communication: Stellate Ganglion Blockade for Persistent Olfactory and Gustatory Symptoms Post-COVID-19.

One hundred ninety-five patients presenting with post-COVID symptomology, including parosmia and dysgeusia, underwent reversible stellate ganglion blockade. Stellate ganglion blockade was performed at an outpatient facility, and patients were evaluated via survey at seven days post-injection. Of the 195 participants, ages ranged from 18-69 years of age with the breakdown of sexes being females n = 157 and males n = 38. The most significant finding was a reported improvement in olfaction post-injection in 87.4% of subjects. The effectiveness of this novel treatment for post-COVID is promising and warrants further investigation.

Otorhinolaryngological Manifestations and Its Management in COVID 19 Patients.

COVID 19 pandemic is caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The first case was identified in December 2019, in Wuhan, China. It is an infectious disease and has led to the ongoing global pandemic. This pandemic has also started in Assam, with its first case reported on 31 March, 2020. A prospective study was conducted on 2000 laboratory confirmed coronavirus cases. Proper history were taken and clinical examinations were performed. They were also advised to do the necessary blood investigations, electrocardiogram and chest X- rays. Olfactory functions were assessed using substances like scented soap, mint toothpaste, vicks vaporub, etc. Gustatory functions were also assessed. In our study, we found that 83% (1650) patients presented with otorhinolaryngological or ENT (Ear, nose, throat) manifestations and 17% (350) did not have any otorhinolaryngological manifestations. The most common ENT symptoms with which the patients presented were sore throat (80%) and headache (76%). The other ENT symptoms were hyposmia (44%), dysgeusia (32%) and nasal congestion (28%). The most common non-ENT symptoms were fever (92%) and cough (85%). The other non-ENT symptoms with which the patient presented were malaise, generalized bodyache and abdominal symptoms (like diarrhea). This prospective study gives a view of the incidence of otorhinolaryngological manifestations in COVID 19 patients. But, no significant co-relation was seen between presence of ENT symptoms and the severity of the disease. However, further studies are required to know the pathogenesis of causing ENT symptoms properly and also for definitive treatment of these symptoms.

A review on oral manifestations of COVID-19 disease.

COVID-19, a multi-system-affecting disease presents with an extensive clinical spectrum, ranging from no symptoms at all to fatal lung involvement. Several orofacial manifestations have also been reported, among which dysgeusia is one of the earliest reported symptoms. Several other manifestations of extensive variety have also been reported by various authors worldwide since the outbreak of the disease. This comprehensive review dispenses a synopsis of the orofacial manifestations of COVID-19 along with a working classification, the knowledge of which is of utmost importance to medical and dental professionals for early detection and prevention of transmission of the disease.

Olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19: a marker of good prognosis?

INTRODUCTION: In May 2020, the World Health Organization recognized olfactory dysfunction as a COVID-19 symptom. The presence of hyposmia/anosmia may be a marker of good prognosis in COVID-19. OBJECTIVE: To associate the presence of olfaction disorder to the clinical condition severity in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: Individuals with the flu syndrome caused by SARS-CoV-2, diagnosed from March to June 2020, were recruited. They were divided into three groups: mild flu syndrome, severe flu syndrome (admitted to hospital wards) and critical illness (admitted to the ICU). Inpatients were interviewed by telephone contact after hospital discharge and their medical records were also evaluated regarding complementary test results. Outpatients answered an electronic questionnaire containing only clinical information. RESULTS: A total of 261 patients participated in the study: 23.75% with mild flu syndrome, 57.85% with severe flu syndrome and 18.40% with critical illness. A total of 66.28% patients with COVID-19 had olfaction disorders. In approximately 56.58% of the individuals the smell alterations lasted between 9 days and 2 months. There was a significantly higher proportion of individuals with olfactory dysfunction in the group with mild flu syndrome than in the severe flu syndrome group (mild × severe - p < 0.001; Odds Ratio = 4.63; 95% CI [1.87-10.86]). This relationship was also maintained between patients with mild flu syndrome and critically-ill patients (mild × critical - p <  0.001; Odds Ratio = 9.28; 95% CI [3.52-25.53]). CONCLUSION: Olfaction dysfunction was significantly more prevalent in patients with mild flu syndrome in COVID-19. It may be a predictor of a good prognosis for this infection. New population-based studies must be carried out to corroborate these findings.

Side Effects of the Sinopharm/BBIBP COVID-19 Vaccine among Iranian Healthcare Workers: A Gender Assessment

Background: Since the outbreak of COVID-19, vaccination has been considered as an important measure against it. Side effects have always been an inseparable component of vaccination, which in this study, Sinopharm vaccine, its side effects and the differences of their manifestation amongst men and women have been investigated. Objective(s): This study aimed to compare the side effects of the Sinopharm vaccine among men and women working in some medical centers in Tehran, Iran. Method(s): This cross-sectional descriptive-analytical study on 890 healthcare workers of 7 medical centers in Tehran within 2 months, from late June to late August 2021. The samples were selected by the complete enumeration method, and the required data were collected using a questionnaire. Only those who received the Sinopharm vaccine at least 10 days before the study were included. Result(s): Of 890 participants, 22.96% and 77.30% were women and men, respectively, and 65.8% of women and 78.1% of men were in the age range of 20-29 years. It was revealed that 74.75% of women and 26.16% of men had at least one side effect. The incidence of at least one side effect was significantly higher in women than in men (P<0.001). It was also found that 12 side effects were significantly higher in women than in men. Most men and women had side effects within the first 24 h after vaccination. There was no significant difference in taking therapeutic measures to reduce or minimize the post-vaccination complications between men and women;however, 9.4% of men and 27.2% of women reported a decline in their ability to perform daily activities as they were unable to do their everyday tasks the day after vaccination which was significantly different between the two groups (P<0.001). Conclusion(s): The results showed that the occurrence rate of side effects after receiving the Sinopharm vaccine was significantly higher in women than in men. Moreover, women were significantly less able to perform daily routines than men.Copyright © 2022, Author(s).

Updated efficacy and safety of taletrectinib in patients (pts) with ROS1+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Background Taletrectinib is a potent, next-generation, CNS-active, ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with selectivity over TRKB. In previous reports from TRUST-I, taletrectinib showed meaningful clinical efficacy and was well tolerated in pts with ROS1+ NSCLC (n = 109) regardless of crizotinib (CRZ) pretreatment status. We report updated efficacy and safety data with ~1.5 yr follow-up. Methods TRUST-I is a multicenter, open-label, single-arm study with two cohorts: ROS1 TKI-naive and CRZ-pretreated. Pts in both cohorts received taletrectinib 600 mg QD. Key study endpoints included IRC-confirmed ORR (cORR), DoR, disease control rate (DCR), PFS, and safety. A pooled analysis of ORR, PFS, and safety including pts from additional clinical trials was also conducted. Results In the 109 pts from TRUST-I (enrolled prior to Feb 2022) the median follow-up was 18.0 mo in TKI-naive (n = 67) and 16.9 mo in CRZ-pretreated pts (n = 42). cORR was 92.5% in TKI-naive and 52.6% in CRZ-pretreated pts (table). Median DoR (mDoR) and mPFS were not reached. Intracranial-ORR was 91.6%;ORR in pts with G2032R was 80.0%. In a pooled analysis with phase I studies, ORR was 89.5% and 50.0% for TKI-naive and CRZ-pretreated pts, respectively;mPFS was 33.2 mo and 9.8 mo. In 178 pts treated at 600 mg QD, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were 92.7%;most (64.0%) were grade 1-2. The most common TEAEs were increased AST (60.7%), increased ALT (55.6%), and diarrhea (55.6%). Neurological TEAEs (dizziness, 18.5%;dysgeusia, 12.4%) and discontinuations due to TEAEs (3.4%) were low. Further updated results will be presented. [Formula presented] Conclusions With additional follow-up, taletrectinib continued to demonstrate meaningful efficacy outcomes including high response rates, prolonged PFS, robust intracranial activity, activity against G2032R, and tolerable safety with low incidence of neurological AEs. Clinical trial identification NCT04395677. Editorial acknowledgement Medical writing and editorial assistance were provided by Arpita Kulshrestha of Peloton Advantage, LLC, an OPEN Health company, and funded by AnHeart Therapeutics, Inc Legal entity responsible for the study AnHeart Therapeutics, Inc. Funding AnHeart Therapeutics, Inc. Disclosure S. He: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Employment: AnHeart Therapeutics. T. Seto: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AbbVie, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly Japan, Kissei Pharmaceutical, MSD, Novartis Pharma, Pfizer Japan, Takeda Pharmaceutical;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Employment: Precision Medicine Asia;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau, Honoraria for lectures: AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Covidien Japan, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly Japan, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, MSD, Mochida Pharmaceutical, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer Japan, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Towa Pharmaceutical. C. Zhou: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting fees: Innovent Biologics Qilu, Hengrui, TopAlliance Biosciences Inc;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau, Payment or honoraria: Eli Lilly China, Sanofi, BI, Roche, MSD, Qilu, Hengrui, Innovent Biologics, C-Stone LUYE Pharma, TopAlliance Biosciences Inc, Amoy Diagnositics, AnHeart. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Anosmia (smell failure) and dysgeusia (taste distortion) in COVID-19: it is genetic.

The COVID-19 pandemic is a very contagious respiratory illness with has affected millions of individuals worldwide. In addition to the well-known symptoms of any respiratory virus, COVID-19 can present with anosmia (failure to smell) and dysgeusia (distortion of the sense of taste). It appears to be a genetic link to the biological mechanisms underlying COVID-19-related anosmia and dysgeusia. Significant locus in the vicinity of the UGT2A1 and UGT2A2 genes are currently considered as the main culprit of the symptoms. However, more studies are needed to delineate a clear pathophysiology.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.